• Announcements

    • Clarifying How To Use the Report Feature   06/29/20

      Hello. I have noticed a great deal of confusion regarding how to use the report feature and what is expected regarding reports, so I am making a clarification announcement to users who may be unfamiliar with how the report feature works. Please note we have this rule regarding reports: 16.  Do report. Do not make frivolous reports (such as "I don't like this person"). Frivolous reports will result in a warning and possible ban. a. When reporting, please give a reason. Reports citing what rule the post is breaking and giving some information are way more valuable and will get the issue resolved faster. (Reports with no explanations sometimes require mods to go through and skim the entire thread to find out what's going on. Please save us time if you can). b. Don’t waste the mods’ time. Report people for breaking the rules, otherwise don’t report. [Rules in their entirety can be found here.] We also have a wonderful tutorial on how to use the report feature created by one of our former moderators which you can find here. In essence, we enforce the rules as they are written. In a rare occasion there may not be a direct violation but the user is still conducting themselves inappropriately and how we handle that is up to the moderators discretion. We do our best. We also encourage you to use the report feature to report posts that have been edited down to nothing or if you double posted and would like your double post hidden. Also, please note that we do not provide updates on reports. We get far too many to be able to keep up with every one. You are welcome to message a moderator to ask about your report, but please know that we cannot and will not divulge any information on whether we banned the user you are reporting. Simply that we have taken appropriate action. I hope this helps provide further clarification on how to use the report feature. Should you have any questions not clear in these instructions, please feel free to message me or Nyx. Thank you. *Please allow up to 3 business days (as we tend to be slower on weekends) for a response and for reports to be cleared.
    • Reputation Has Increased!   07/06/20

      Hello. You have been asking for it and it is finally here. We have increased the number of reputation given in a day from 25 to 50. We will see how well 50 works out and if that is enough. Please continue to provide feedback and we will reevaluate as needed. This change has been added to the site changes thread located here. Happy repping. Thank you.

Taylor R - videos #2

9191 posts in this topic

Posted

I think you need to educate yourself on the laws? In Canada its actually illegal to suggest someone is under 18 even if they are not for fantasies or sexual intent as well to gain monitary gain is also very illegal and falls under our child porn laws so I am sorry but you are wrong. If Tom comes back to Canada I hope they check his computer etc so he can be charged as I know he was reported to customs. For every good woman out there we have a 100 turn the cheek kind of gals just like you and Taylor.

 

 

As a survivor of rape, please do not ever call me a "turn the cheek" kind of person. I am not.

I don't understand what you are trying to say, as photographs of fully clothed women are not considered child porn. I used to model around age 10 in bikinis for a childrens clothing line... is that child porn? Of course not. It is not sexually explicit in any nature and features me CLOTHED. Otherwise we would be prosecuting all young girls out on the beach in bikins?? 

"The Criminal Code of Canada defines "child pornography" as a photographic, film, video or other visual representation that shows a person who is under the age of eighteen, and is engaged in, or is depicted as engaged in, explicit sexual activity."

This. is. not. child. porn. I don't take child porn lightly and find it disgusting that people consume such things. But this is not it. You are wrong. And if you are right, then we can all be prosecuted too, as it is punishable by law to consume any form of child pornorgraphy. 

Peace. 

-10

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

There is a difference of a10 year old wearing a two piece as swimwear clothing store vs a 10 year old trying to look mature for photos in an adult website. 

 

There were no 10 year olds on the website. Regardless, my point is that it cannot be considered to be child pornography. I agree that some might find it morally questionable, but suggesting it is child porn? False. 

0

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

Instead of trying to bullshit by “educating” her fans by “culture” she should educate her man about the reality of having minors on his NSFW (Not Safe For Work) adult content website. Is it really that hard for him to understand? Or he’s like an old dog? (“You can't teach an old dog new tricks?”) Is called common sense despite the “culture”. 

 

If her husband is well educated about the Canadian Raptors why can’t he educate himself a little better about some common sense about “other cultures”. Again I enjoy how she tries to bullshit themselves out of this by saying “culture”. 

Yeah right? Like thanks Taylor now everyone thinks every asian man is a creep that likes underaged girls with school uniforms 

9

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

While I'm glad that Taylor had a talk with Tom and they've decided to stop putting under-18 girls on their website, I still feel disgusted with both of them.

Obviously, Tom allowed, or even encouraged it on his website. Not sure why some people are acting as if he is innocent and had nothing to do with the whole thing. There is clear evidence that he was aware of the underaged girls on his website, such as sharing the photos on his social media. 

Taylor, while it's not her website, likely knew of the girls. I'm sure she's poked around his website at least a few times, and she even modeled for it, right? (Might be remembering wrong.)

Taylor probably knew Tom was accepting or even interested in young girls as soon as she met him, but all she could think about was that $$$ and all the nice apartments and clothes she'd have if she got with him. 

They're both acting apologetic, but they're not sorry about what they've done, they're sorry they've been caught and called out. 

It's really kind of unfortunate. I think before, none of us really saw Taylor as that impressive or great, but we at least respected somewhat her pursuits in modelling and Youtube.

Some of her videos of her decorating her house or traveling around were sort of soothing to me, since they were always very laid-back and well edited. I don't think I can forgive her and Tom for this one. I'm probably permanently turned off from her youtube channel now :/ 

10

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

With her luxury lifestyle that she has. I am surprised she actually looks worse. If I were her, I would hire someone to do my hair like the one in the pictures and then teach me how to do it by myself in the future and the same thing goes for her eyebrows, her mascara, her foundation-application and her lips.

 

I sooooo agree, this is exactly what I think everytime. She could even do a video out of this too, like "I hired someone to upgrade my looks" or something.

6

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

Omg she looked so fresh and pretty. She could look stunning but she chooses not to, simple as that.

 

5

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

Long time lurker

She always comes across as a person that tries to follow the latest trends then really define her own beauty and style. Personally i think the whole Instagram look doesn't really suit her as much as she tries with it.

I think a classic, demure look suits her well. Such as her pre-dolly days and when she tried on the wedding dresses. It would make for an interesting video if she could do a whole makeover where she finds the right clothing, make up, colours, the suitable makeup application for her features, hair cut and colour. There's plenty of websites and videos online that cater to that. I think Safiya Nygaard did a video on the subject.

Tay take note 😉

Truthisbeauty.com

Aly Art (youtube)

8

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

Again with these dumb arguments... (Spoilering because this will get long)

I'm sorry but I have to tell off people who are going to defend sexualized images of children.

Hidden Content

 

Yes a thousend times yes. If I were the mother of one of the underage girls pictured on the MC page, I would sue Mr. Lip and I would win.

1

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

I just remembered that Tom gave Taylor a doll that looked exactly like Taylor during her time in Tokyo. At that time I thought it was just strange, but today I find it VERY strange.

6

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

oh yeah, a Pullip or Blythe that he had custom made to look like her (I remember because she just shoves them in a closet, and I know girls who saved for a year to buy one!)

4

Share this post


Link to post

Posted

But that's if you believe her....She had tons to bitch about but only pulled out 2 weak (receipts) YT comments from someone named Mariska and all it said was "I can't un see what I saw" and something about naked underage 

Look my thing is who even asked her to address it. One comment on a video? Some lurker commented on a video and got the attention of her fans, Now she's just responding to our discussion on PULL, if Taylor's feelings were hurt thats on her. And if the ONE person was from PULL it's still just one person no one is forcing her to do shit. She's a grown woman and culpable for what she chooses to do and say. But you know what, if her husband is letting her spend his kiddy fetish money that's absolutely her business and she could have chosen to remain silent. But she didn't and we are allowed to have opinions of her based on those actions. I personally have no interest in defending her. Egirls are fine. It's fine that Tay was one. Taylor does not own the site, she just married the man who does. She worked for a gross company and chose to publicly defend it. She and Tom both choose what they put online and attach their faces to and that is that.

 

You're just as bad a Taylor... PULL shouldn't be your first priority the sexualizing of children and woman should be. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
This topic is now closed to further replies.