> Literature grad > "Notibly" THE LETTERS A AND I ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE ON A QWERTY KEYBOARD. It is not a typo. It is spelled "notably" FYI. Besides, the rough analysis the people here provided is accurate and your text doesn't actually really disagree with that. We know that Nabokov wrote it beautifully to show how fucked up Humbert is. They commented on the juxtaposition - how the text is written so romantically yet what Humbert is doing is just abuse. I know you're looking for an excuse to show off how smart with literature you are and all, but it's sort of silly. We know that Lolita is a masterpiece in its own right because it can generate both wonder and disgust. The issue we have is with the people who read it like a romantic novel and romanticising the novel. Humbert is an unreliable narrator. And if you call yourself a nymphet and justify it, just like he tried to justify it, you're dumb enough to fall into this fictional character's trap.
Lmao come on, Nattit. Breathing is a reflex action. I know people with asthma who can breathe through their nose just fine most of the time.
Besides, if she had some sort of apnea she would have been speaking about it left and right because she loves those sympathy begging "fun facts about me ^_^". She'd post pictures of her oxygen machine. She's so full of shit. Just don't open your mouth for pictures at this angle and change your facial expression, it's simple. You don't have to look like an aquarium cleaner fish.
How is her personal info at risk? Girl is lucky she doesn't have a thread on kiwifarms because they doxx, I'm pretty sure doxxing isn't allowed on PULL. Idk man, her writing style is very difficult to read - it is boring, it doesn't captivate me, and I just skim whatever is written because the lack of punctuation makes it seem very disengaging. But I am very picky with these things as I respect language and I like enjoying reading what I see. Regardless, whatever the say, nymphet shit fetishises children. It is what it is. Explanations don't really matter to me as we all know where the whole thing came from, the source material, and that it is not at all romantic. But tbh I am partly just stirring the pot along because it's funny to see all those pedo enablers go ape shit when called out. I don't think PULL users care as much as those girls think we do.
Crop tops don't look good on her. She has very wide hips and crop tops make her look very boxy and basically drown out her waist. She really needs a stylist because even a 5 year old knows more about what looks good than Sarah does.
This thread caused so many of those accounts to panic, it is rather hilarious. Her rant isn't really coherent to me. She knows fully well what the community is. People here who belonged to the community in the past spoke about how damaging it really was. About the predatory behaviour it invites. Their ego is very delicate, innit. Pedophiles try to soften their fucked up existence by calling themselves "maps" (minor attracted people) and the young girls who invite those fucked up pedos call themselves "nymphettes". Just say what you are. A pedophilia condoning piece of crap, basing your existence off a fucked up interpretation of an intentionally fucked up book.
Thx for your rant. Very entertaining. I wouldn't call romanticising of pedophilia "no reason", it is enough reason to warrant a thread. Furthermore, all the things posted, screenshots and all, were put up on the internet by these girls for all to see. We are calling out you all because you condone and enable pedophilia, hell, encourage it. No matter what you say that is really the truth as it is obvious none of you do it for "aesthetic". Making out that an old, grown ass man going crazy for a young, teenage girl is romantic is enabling these men and indicating that what they do is okay. They are pedophiles. You are all condoning their behaviour. Congratulations on your fucking "community" lol
Lmao all those girls are such Trainwrecks. The rants are funny tho tbh because it's like they are denying that they are doing things which they literally put up on the internet for all to see (sexualising children etc)
Exactly. Her message is good, but she is speaking bs because she actually would be considered small chested if she was not pushing her arms together so much lol. Anything for a self-important, "feminist" message I suppose.
Tbh though her photos were always very sexual. It is obvious that a lot of the photos she takes are to emphasise her chest in a sexual manner. Sure, comments sexualising boobs when they're not meant to be sexualised are gross. I have the same issue where I feel uncomfortable in low cut tops. But tbh she is reaching because her profile is revolved around her sexuality so people will comment on it. It would be inappropriate in an actual social setting, but her boobs are the intentional focus in many of her pics. No problem with that, but she can't then complain that people comment on it. And tbh if you view her candids her boobs aren't big at all.