Yep, she's secretly been telepathic this whole time. That's why her language and spelling was always so bad. Unfortunately her telepathy is dyslexic too, so when she means to ask "can I pray here" instead she asks "can I pee here". Made for some uncomfortable incidents at the mosque.
Trying to put myself in his shoes, but I couldn't mentally reproduce the reaction even if it was the privacy angle. The only thing I can think of is that he is asexual, that Venus knows this, and he feels a little put off that Venus is pushing this on him. Remember one of the initial 'exposé' statements from Margaret was that Venus was asexual? Maybe she is, or was at the time, and Manaki is too. If it was something they shared it would be nice for a relationship (perhaps asexual but not aromantic). To have one partner start to act much less asex would make the other feel pretty lousy, as in 'I thought we shared this one very important thing'. That's probably reading into it too much though. Could just be a combination of small factors, like trying to speak English, being on camera, being surprised, trying to be funny and it not really working, etc.
From what I know of her, she wants no such person. Her mother and Venus are really her only long term relationships, everyone else is a candle in the wind. Seems like familiarity makes her feel claustrophobic.
No idea why I'm being called a 50 year old pervert, neither is true. Where do people get this stuff? No idea what Angus is talking about either, where am I trolling? Where am I being insincere? No one said Venus shouldn't be allowed to talk about her past. Are people actually reading or are they skimming and making up the rest? And of course Margaret gets tons of hate on all her social media, she deletes most of it but plenty of it gets private messaged to her. What difference does it make? Yes Venus' videos could be construed as bullying, so what? Do these things automatically make Margaret a saint? Nope.
Statements are in conflict. Read what Unlock said, that nothing could be construed as bullying or slander from Venus, but this is simply false. I'm against demonstrably, or logically false statements. I would also like people to keep in mind that the most damning 'evidence' against Margaret literally comes from Venus' words. I'm not saying Venus is lying or that her credibility is in question, but when so much hinges on a few statements you have to realize how easy it would be to lie/embellish (even by accident!) and the resulting power of doing so. Just imagine if we could magically prove somehow that say the Venus knife story wasn't true, nor the 'are you pregnant' story. Suddenly things wouldn't be so clear, even if Margaret's behavior on instagram and such would still be difficult to forgive. We would all like life to follow a Disney style narrative, where it's absolutely clear who sleeping beauty and the wicked witch is. Real life seldom works that way though, and the bottom line is that these people are strangers to us. Speak for yourself, read from Margaret Palermo page 1. Replace Margaret with the name of someone you know. The impression you will get does not make my scenario that great of a leap. Yep, would you find it difficult to keep quiet if when your son or daughter moved out and became a celebrity they mentioned to the press that you were physically and psychologically abusive to them growing up? Even going so far as to throw knives at them? (Assuming this isn't true of course!) The first part of the definition fits perfectly, superior strength = 1.6 million subscribers. Just ask yourself the question, if Venus says something that isn't true regarding Margaret in one of her videos, what can Margaret realistically do about it? The second part of the definition is less clear, so maybe the term doesn't fit perfectly, but then again Margaret's English vocabulary is still rather limited.
If it's the truth, then yes. It would upset you to be completely railroaded by distortions or non-truths though. I think a lot of people on this forum are young, aren't parents or just don't really know their parents/guardians all that well. Just because someone has a child doesn't mean they completely relinquish their ego and become selfless bodhisattvas. It's like Margaret isn't given the right to feel offended or upset over Venus' public videos that don't paint her in the best light. Don't get me wrong, Venus has every right to make such videos, and she can't really discuss her upbringing without telling us something about Margaret. It's just that why can't at least the possibility be acknowledged that such things could be unfair? That if you were Margaret it would be normal to feel attacked? Like I said, maybe you think she deserves it but that is something different. Look at it this way, hypothetical scenario: Venus flies to Seoul, finds her mother and stabs her dead. Be honest, how many people here would be like "well her mother drove her to it with her lifetime of abuse and Venus finally snapped, I don't think she deserves any prison time." It's like there literally is no line that Venus cannot cross, but I'm not even asking for that, I'm saying can we at least give an iota of validation to Margaret feeling "bullied"? Even if you believe she deserves it or is guilty of more of it herself?
Assuming those things are true and indicate an accurate picture of the persons involved. Imagine if you selected only the meanest things your parents ever said to you and only presented those to the public. It would be easy to make them look like monsters, even though it was "just bringing up things said to you as a child". I mean I get it that no one agrees with Margaret, but to indicate that Venus' statements could in no way be construed as bullying I think is simply false. Put yourself in her shoes. The negative feedback is real. I can understand how people could think she deserves it though. I don't know about slanderous, but it would certainly be insulting if it wasn't true or was a terrible distortion of the truth. I think she means that Venus' fans come after her every time there is one of these videos with negative Margaret stories in them, and said fans tell her such things. Highly plausible, but no hard evidence of it. Nonetheless I don't think it's that much of a stretch.
It's funny you mentioned that because I just had a comment disappear from a Margaret video. I assume she removed it, and that I can still see it from my account because that's just how it works. I only have one account and can't see it if I visit when logged out. The timing of your post could very well be completely coincidental, or it could be that something actually odd is going on with youtube, shrug.
Mira is not a network executive, and undeserved audience in Japan? There are less than 200k muslims in Japan, they would have to all watch her videos and even then she'd be a lower tier creator. You might as well be catering to Hindus in Estonia or Shintoists in Jamaica.