We've heard you loud and clear - negative reputation is back. Remember that it's still against the rules to complain about being downvoted - if you think someone's mass-downvoting posts or otherwise abusing the reputation system, DM a mod and we will take care of it.
Her face does look pretty fucked in that pic but this comment is pretty rude... it’s the same vibes as people saying “Oh you look better without all the makeup.” Imagine if someone said “just wanted to let you know that you don’t need that makeup 💕” It’s obviously super condescending.
Isn’t the reason she gets flack for editing because she claims she barely does, and it’s all light snow filters (this was before you could adjust your individual features on snow, too)? If you look at her post on the second page of the thread, she claims she doesn’t edit her nose at all, which is and has been clearly untrue.
I said this in a different thread too, but that site is wildly inaccurate. She has a little under 198k followers; getting only 3.4k likes would be horrendous and a sign of a dead account. For reference, most brands look for people with at 5% likes at the very least for collaboration, and a healthy growing account should get about 10%. James Charles is really relevant right now with way over the "expected" amounts of comments and likes, and this site still rates him as 73% real followers.
That site is one of the most inaccurate follower calculators. It doesn’t take into account that larger followings naturally have lower interaction rates, especially for comments. Even someone like Jeffrey Star or other celebrities don’t get the “expected amount” of comments. J*’s rating is only 77% and his fan base is rabid. James Charles’s rating is only 73% despite having way over the expected amount of likes and comments.