Yeah but I think it still matters because Ren got the same kind of dumb suspension for "misgendering". And also the irony on the Vic lickers on how kickvick is so vile and brutal because they are deplatforming them just because "they oppose them, or don't like them", and not because they broke the rules or something, and then YF, an Vic stan literally deplatforms ren for having an opposing opinion or YF hating her.
And it’s not limited to regions either, different console companies will moderate the content on their platform differently, like the PlayStation for example and its more aggressive censorship of sexualized content. It’s just amazing the reaction of people like Joey to this edit, like some criticisms like how the character is a gymnast and that’s what they wear so makes sense, but others are just like looking at his bio which says to not edit his art and then claim it’s hypocrisy which no, he didn’t made a statement to not edit anyone’s art because it’s bad or something he just said to not edit his art, preference is not hypocrisy. This reminds me of the whole One Angry Gamer situation where he got pissed over a character being covered on the next edition of Mortal Kombat and claimed it SJW pandering and threatening the “boner culture”.
So Matt the nerdskull made a thread about Vic stans https://twitter.com/M_Nerdskull/status/1120491604173905920 Some Vic stans didn’t like that..
Anyone who is using the pejorative “soy boy” probably isn’t acting in good faith. And what’s gonna say Nick to him anyway? How a piece of garbage is for opposing him? This guy was definitely the most butthurt Just look at how many tweets he made about it
Where the fuck did you get the idea that Ren is promoting to false flag people, from what I know your side celebrated when Ren got suspended/banned for ridiculous reasons. Trump was also accused of sexual assault (multiple times) and then his supporters said it’s all fake news or SJW propaganda or something, and the Vic stans are doing the same with Vic so it’s not a surprise that some Vic stans might be Trump supporters.
If Vic is so “innocent” then why is he acting like he’s a sexual predator around people? So yeah I want to know your opinions about this. (edit: I’m on phone and can’t embed tweets for some reason)
I thought of that scenario too, that the account might not be SJW Spider-Man himself but a fake one trying to deceive us or something or make us looking that we’re throwing our own people or something. That’s why I said that I “don’t think” they are the account, I wasn’t very sure, there wasn’t that much evidence about it. I mean in what manner did the account write/spoke that it wasn’t really that SJW Spider-Man from twitter?
I don’t think they were that account, this is SJW Spider-Man’s Twitter by the way https://mobile.twitter.com/SjwSpiderman I think they might very be that account who white-nightied endlessly on the thread. I like how this guy tries to twist things up by saying that we are the actually vile and bad guys and that we ban people when we “don’t need them” when the reality is that we ban people who BREAK THE RULES OF THE SITE.
So turns out that Pedantic is accused of backpedaling... He further argued against it by stating that she was talking about the propaganda FROM YOUTUBE where she talked about it in the first tweet of the thread. I mean, most of, if not the entire misinformation or propaganda from Youtube is coming from the #IstandwithVic side. Maybe she was saying on that first tweet that not all communities are perfect and have certain misinformation and propaganda from certain people or that she's not implying that his side is completely right and other completely wrong? Anyway, even if Pedantic was backpedaling that doesn't make the other side better either, it kinda makes it worse knowing that their biggest defense to their side is basically an ad hominem based of one person certain inconsistency of debate. I don't know, I want your opinions about this. Also, I remember there was some rape accusations against Vic, I want to know if these accusations are proven to be true or likely to be, if some of them were false, or if some of the said accusations never happened.