We've heard you loud and clear - negative reputation is back. Remember that it's still against the rules to complain about being downvoted - if you think someone's mass-downvoting posts or otherwise abusing the reputation system, DM a mod and we will take care of it.
Except she's proven to be boosted and she had been shady about it for ages. Losing a bunch of games on stream, but if you look at her op.gg she plays with people who clearly boost her. She also has under 50% winrate........................ because she loses a bunch and then gets someone to carry her. "Diamond ranked uwu" she says in her stream title...as she cuts away the part of the client that tells it's a normal game. A diamond player has no reason to lie and hide.
Oh damn.............this escalated hard. I wish her absolutely no harm but streaming self harm is absolutely, and I mean absolutely crazy. She needs help, and now. This goes way beyond what a forum with strict rules on contacting the snowflakes could cause, no one here ever wished her harm; we were just holding a LEGAL ADULT that was proved to be lying and scamming accountable. Guys, no one here has anything to feel guilty for. Cyome get real and face your problems because if you keep blaming others you'll never get better, ever. Serious suicidal thoughts ARE considered emergency in most if not all European countries, and if you truly feel this way, there is plenty of help out there for you. But do not use this to get away from responsibilities.
What I can't stand about "famous" people subtweeting is that they simultaneously go out of their way to get people curious & invested in their lives and ASK FOR PRIVACY. You cannot have both. Venting is normal and healthy but do it in your chat group with friends where people know what's going on..........or face the consequences of getting 1 million people curious.
Also I know right? I feel like it's so often the laziest people that become egirls lol, they don't have the ethic to do anything else and they feel they are "too good" for a retail or otherwise low paid ungrateful job. They are the female equivalents of basement dwelling neckbeards who are like "we live in a society" lol (Just to be clear, when I say egirls, I'm not talking about erotic cosplayers who provide regular and high quality content, just the snapchat-blurry-selfie-Spreepicky-underwear type with one wig ) And the weirdest part is they still find a way to keep their mental higher ground while doing the same job, nothing wrong with sex work but then blaming others who do the same...oof.
Additionally! As someone already said, if you have severe anxiety to the point you need to regularly take breaks from the internet, then...exposing your nearly naked body for everyone to see is literally one of the worst things you could do lol. Get a therapist, get pills, whatever you need, but don't get addicted to attention of people online tf
Literally all of this pointless discussion aside, I'm definitely not okay with how some of you just...accepted? Her hypocrisy? Being like, "yeah she would be an okay egirl" after she literally dissed and shat on egirls for years. She doesn't deserve to make money "off her looks" after publicly shaming others who do the same, many of whom did a lot less questionable things that she dragged them for. Still not trying to start a fight, I don't even particularly dislike her compared to some other people we discuss on this forum but she's beyond the point of redemption. She needs to get off the internet and do something with her life that doesn't continue her vicious cycle of whatever she's been doing. It's not healthy or good for anyone. I am pretty convinced by her behavior that she's trying to cure her self hatred by simply gathering attention, and especially at that age that is a no-go from me. Go and get your IRL life in order and you'll find yourself not needing attention online, Aria.
Are you guys serious? Like, don't get me wrong, she's really not ugly, but she has one of those faces that make me physically feel uncomfortable if I see them put in some sexual context. Basically, she has no sex appeal and looks awkward and in pain when trying to be sexy. Both the pink wig one and the knife one look like she's simultaneously underage and way too old for this shit. Sorry but if even making everything blurry and edited doesn't make you sexy then yeah a career of an egirl is not for you. I respect everyone else's opinions here but I personally cannot see her succeeding with this. Even if guys have low standards, girls like Belle Delphine at least know how to push things and exaggerate them in a way where even their ridiculous faces and poses look at very least interesting. Aria just looks like she's feeling ill Additionally, there's no way she'd go for mature look because that's not what sells on the internet, simple and plain. Pink wig half naked bitches who look like they are 12 = money.
I was truly very bored so I went into it, but I don't think it's "fuck you", I think it's "thank you". Now, I'm not able to do magic here, but what I WAS able to do is get my friend to DM me on twitter and this is what we got:
On the far left, it's Poki's DMs, on the right you have my friend sending you "fuck you" and "thank you" with both capitalised and non-capitalised first letters. I hope that helps
It's not that Japan doesn't do autumn. Japan doesn't do autumn in that super fake, uwu cozy leaves+tea+book+Halloween vibe that seems to be Kenna's entire personality, I'm guessing. (idk that much about Japan) So as far as SHE is concerned... Japan doesn't do autumn.
I think each song represents them going up a year. Correct me if I misunderstood. So nap time scene is when they are like 7-8, Teacher's Pet is later, teenage years, probably 16-17. The "dance" is prom, or some sort of reference to prom.
That aside, I was surprised how polished it looked at some points, the "vibe" of it, the scene design and colours are really well thought through and connect together beautifully, however the same cannot be said of the dialogue (????????????) or story, which is messy. Some of the conversations just feel fake deep as someone said above. She's certainly not an impressive director. If the story was supposed to be longer, she should have rewritten it when realizing that it's not happening, not just. Cut things out unnaturally. Characters also have absolutely zero personality. In the end, I didn't like a single song which is a shame because regardless of her questionable nature, I really loved some stuff from the older album. But this album was just all the same mellow slow stuff, repeated over and over. Not even one song stood out musically, but I did really like the message of a couple of them even if cheesy.
She appeared in the newest Michael Reeves video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvrkHAWj1Sk I just can't believe how every of her poses and expressions looks so forced. I don't watch and never watched any of her content, so perhaps I'm just not used to it, but she inserts herself into every possible second and well.... People are just standing normally, meanwhile she fixes her shirt, hair, and pants. She looks super stiff, I guess? Judge for yourself.
What's with the keeping leg in that position? Is it to appear like she has wider hips/longer legs?
Anyway, just some commentary from me. I don't know if I'm overthinking because I'm just mad I was watching something I actually like and was forced to see her fake ass LMAO
Guys....I don't think she puts a lot of effort into her art. It's lazy and fast. And her attitude isn't admirable either. But she's still not forcing anyone to buy it, and lets be honest, while 17USD is a bit much, it's not like it's absolutely atrocious either. Anime style artists do commonly charge between 12-20 USD even for simple headshots. Some more, some less, but mind you, an actual professional illustrator would charge 40 USD PER HOUR minimum. If these do indeed take her an hour and a half, she's not paid even half that, not even close. I think a lot of hatred for this girl comes from envy and it's honestly a little lame. Whether you like it or not, fame and efame do come with certain benefits, one of them being the fact your name means something. And so, her name means something to her fans - it means something to be able to get something from her specifically. Some won't like her price, but many others will be happy to pay that price to get a sketch from someone they admire. If you don't like that, it still doesn't mean that she (and similar people) are in the wrong. You are all (and me myself, and my small following included) cordially invited to go ahead and get famous and then get "ez $$$". If anything, one of the biggest and worst issues of art communities online is the underpricing. If you don't want to support someone, then don't, but think about all other artists who might finally understand they don't have to charge $5 and cry themselves to sleep every night wondering if they can survive the month. I think a lot of her fans are also very young and I'm sorry to say but a 14-year old cannot possibly know how much things are worth in reality. If they can't afford it because their mommy didn't give them their monthly allowance yet, that's not the artist's problem. People don't walk into a grocery store and tell the cashier that the bag of crisps isn't worth $1 but 0.20 because that's how much it costs to produce one. People don't get to decide prices of things - they only get to decide whether to buy it or not. This isn't healthcare or some other essential life thing - I cannot stress this hard enough. Art is a LUXURY good, something that you do not NEED. It can cost whatever the artists want to price it because of that reason.
Also - you can't use word "scam" to describe everything you don't like. I get not agreeing with someone and their life choices and their pricing, but that's not what scam means. It would be scam if she doesn't deliver what people pay for (see: cyome thread). People getting exactly what was advertised is hardly scam.
Not saying their art is worth $17 for that sketch, but also, I wish people stopped acting like artists owe them something in this sense. If you can't afford it, don't buy it. Buying art is a luxury and it's a product of someone learning and practicing a long time to be able to produce that sketch (even if it is in 10min now). The ridiculously low prices give people unrealistic expectations of how much time and effort art takes. I know it's simple and I don't think she's a good artist, personally, but if people want her art, then they should pay her price. If they don't wanna, they do not have to. No one is holding a gun to their head. Art isn't supposed to be affordable to everyone.
What I don't get is: If she doesn't want people questioning her for buying expensive things and calling her out on it....why doesn't she stop posting them? Like? Pretending you're a poor sad little thing is a lot easier if you don't flex your newest clothes and tech on your social media Is she just dumb?